Re: Gyrojet Pistol
Posted: Mon Sep 22, 2014 1:15 am
sen:
rifle range, 80%+ hit rate was the key, at 1km it takes skill, at 2km it goes beyond science into mystical prediction skills, remember even a really fast bullet takes a few seconds to get there(.338 lapua, favored long range round, has a muzzle velocity of 900m/s or so, it will lose some speed along the way, so about 3(no closer to 5) seconds for a 2km shot.), and a mobile target with that delay is rather difficult to lead.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5MJI6NII68 <--- 2.5km i obviously doable, but it is damn difficult, and as it showed
hmm, 2500m five seconds, 500m/s average starting out at 900m/s it just might have gone sub sonic on the way, that fucks up precision something fierce btw.
according to data those rounds usually drop sub sonic at 1300m or so.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Harr ... 8sniper%29 <--- run down of the longest confirmed shot.
2. Abrams weighs in at 68 tons, MGS comes in at 18.7 according to open data....pretty exactly fifty ton difference.
road friendly? i know the abrams is supposed to be this badassmobile, but REAL tanks avoid driving on roads, for tactical reasons.
and that is the reason why american tanks are afraid of IED's while the europeans in the same war were wondering 'what IEDs? we never encountered no stinking IEDs!'
M1 bashing of the day done.
4. yup, such dial in devices are available on the open market, just add power.
but seriously, at 2000+ watts you will drown out just about any portable device at rather long range, remember, cell phone uses under one watt and got a range measured in km.
that also means positioning is important, if you get a jammer BETWEEN the units you are jamming....
but seriously, was thinking wrong with the sweeping frequencies, that might be bad for digital since packet loss is a serious issue...but not for analog.
so units that scan for radio, when it picks something up, jam the crap out of that signal for a few minutes, look for a new signal(that is not one of it's jammer buddies.)
i used 2000 watts since that is readily available in every home, possibly on multiple lines....for example, i could theoretically run three 3000 watt jammers without overloading my breakers at my home, i would probably want to stay at 2000 though, just to be sure.
so, target the freq, toss random noise at it, needs to be able to jam plenty of freqs too...well, comes back to what i opened with, not really difficult but you do however need plenty of power.
area denial.
is just that, it would not be individually guided, at best just 'home in on something' kind of indiscriminate slaughter.....
crazy idea, balloon tethered mines, simple mechanical release + radio+wire controlled, maybe electric too? kinda like bouncing betty, just different.
overly effective? not really, but fear factor? pretty huge.
rifle range, 80%+ hit rate was the key, at 1km it takes skill, at 2km it goes beyond science into mystical prediction skills, remember even a really fast bullet takes a few seconds to get there(.338 lapua, favored long range round, has a muzzle velocity of 900m/s or so, it will lose some speed along the way, so about 3(no closer to 5) seconds for a 2km shot.), and a mobile target with that delay is rather difficult to lead.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5MJI6NII68 <--- 2.5km i obviously doable, but it is damn difficult, and as it showed
hmm, 2500m five seconds, 500m/s average starting out at 900m/s it just might have gone sub sonic on the way, that fucks up precision something fierce btw.
according to data those rounds usually drop sub sonic at 1300m or so.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Craig_Harr ... 8sniper%29 <--- run down of the longest confirmed shot.
2. Abrams weighs in at 68 tons, MGS comes in at 18.7 according to open data....pretty exactly fifty ton difference.
road friendly? i know the abrams is supposed to be this badassmobile, but REAL tanks avoid driving on roads, for tactical reasons.
and that is the reason why american tanks are afraid of IED's while the europeans in the same war were wondering 'what IEDs? we never encountered no stinking IEDs!'
M1 bashing of the day done.
4. yup, such dial in devices are available on the open market, just add power.
but seriously, at 2000+ watts you will drown out just about any portable device at rather long range, remember, cell phone uses under one watt and got a range measured in km.
that also means positioning is important, if you get a jammer BETWEEN the units you are jamming....
but seriously, was thinking wrong with the sweeping frequencies, that might be bad for digital since packet loss is a serious issue...but not for analog.
so units that scan for radio, when it picks something up, jam the crap out of that signal for a few minutes, look for a new signal(that is not one of it's jammer buddies.)
i used 2000 watts since that is readily available in every home, possibly on multiple lines....for example, i could theoretically run three 3000 watt jammers without overloading my breakers at my home, i would probably want to stay at 2000 though, just to be sure.
so, target the freq, toss random noise at it, needs to be able to jam plenty of freqs too...well, comes back to what i opened with, not really difficult but you do however need plenty of power.
area denial.
is just that, it would not be individually guided, at best just 'home in on something' kind of indiscriminate slaughter.....
crazy idea, balloon tethered mines, simple mechanical release + radio+wire controlled, maybe electric too? kinda like bouncing betty, just different.
overly effective? not really, but fear factor? pretty huge.