Re: Page 90
Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 2:41 am
Velocity. Not acceleration.
https://www.well-of-souls.com/forums/
https://www.well-of-souls.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=180
nnn, no, not to my understanding, things either slow down or speed up, there is no sidestepping of causalityNemo wrote:Also have to remember that these causality breaking events don't just happen at relativistic velocities, they're just easier to conceptualize. ALL time is relative to the frame: time at sea level is different from time in Denver because of minute differences in gravity. Time at the equator is different from time at the north pole because of different velocities. Time for you is different than it is for the computer in front of you, just not enough to notice. Anything that travels faster than light side steps time. Anything side stepping time side steps cause.
It's c, lower case. And the fastest possible velocity in all directions is always c, in all inertial frames. Measure the speed of light in all directions from here on Earth...c. Accelerate until you're flying away from Earth at 0.999c and repeat the measurements...it's still c, in all directions.discord wrote:on 'absolute rest frame' if C truly is a constant, and the fastest possible velocity in a given direction is C, then by definition you HAVE a absolute rest frame, at absolutely zero velocity....but since physics guys keep saying that it's a matter of perspective....can you out accelerate a photon by C? no you can't, ergo, there is a rest frame, it's just not easily measured.
And your understanding has been shown to be incomplete. Preservation of causality requires that signals don't travel faster than c. Velocities larger than c are as nonsensical to the universe as velocities lower than zero. There's completely-theoretical particles that travel faster than c, but they are only made consistent with observations and theory by restricting their interactions with normal matter so they can't actually transmit information faster than c.Cy83r wrote:nnn, no, not to my understanding, things either slow down or speed up, there is no sidestepping of causality
so they can't actually transmit information faster than c.
That's precisely the understanding it I was talking about.Mjolnir wrote:It's c, lower case. And the fastest possible velocity in all directions is always c, in all inertial frames. Measure the speed of light in all directions from here on Earth...c. Accelerate until you're flying away from Earth at 0.999c and repeat the measurements...it's still c, in all directions.discord wrote:on 'absolute rest frame' if C truly is a constant, and the fastest possible velocity in a given direction is C, then by definition you HAVE a absolute rest frame, at absolutely zero velocity....but since physics guys keep saying that it's a matter of perspective....can you out accelerate a photon by C? no you can't, ergo, there is a rest frame, it's just not easily measured.
Shown, no; admitted, yes. I would expect you to know the difference between 'I don't understand' and 'You're right, I'm wrong'. Now let's forget this entire thing because I'm going to wind up committing bannable offenses if we continue.And your understanding has been shown to be incomplete. Preservation of causality requires that signals don't travel faster than c. Velocities larger than c are as nonsensical to the universe as velocities lower than zero. There's completely-theoretical particles that travel faster than c, but they are only made consistent with observations and theory by restricting their interactions with normal matter so they can't actually transmit information faster than c.Cy83r wrote:nnn, no, not to my understanding, things either slow down or speed up, there is no sidestepping of causality
Heh, I suck actually, I'm still in the tutorial Kendoka classes, though we're starting to merge with the main group. The upperclassmen set a really brutal pace compared to what we're used to... though I guess that's to be expected when compared to us newbies. They might even entrust us with bogu someday!Cy83r wrote:
Also, you take Kendo classes? You win.
Yeah, I'm wondering myself when the whole aspect of sanzai "conversing truth without words" and the human ideal of words of honor gets deeply discussed between Alexander and Still Storm, or maybe just he and Beyrl hash it out for exposition's sake.Razor One wrote:Tangenitally on topic... I do wonder sometimes how certain Earth sports, martial arts in particular, would be viewed through Loroi eyes.
Especially Kendo... especially when the Kiai'ing starts up.
Yes, I have a vested interest
I pretty much agree with this, I used to attend a Koei-Kan karate dojo (apparently it's not technically karate because it came over originally from a Chinese artist) and the one thing I can still pull off without any bad form are my falls and those (plus the ingrained reaction) have saved me some major pain at least once when I was struck by a car while riding my bike. The bike took the entire beating (somehow had my leg away from the impact side before I even realized I was about to get hit) and got wedged in the front wheel well allowing myself to pop off and roll ahead of the car, my poor fall parka taking most of the abuse the road dished out.discord wrote:nemo: balance and falling techniques are probably the most useful things any martial arts class ever taught, those things save lives(or at least pain injury and indignity) on a regular basis, but it is mostly negative values so no one notices it.
and yes, most 'martial arts' have pretty much left the area of functional warfare behind, it's second tier abilities at best nowadays....but several schools teach disarming techniques against bladed and projectile weapons...i suppose that counts for something.
Wouldn´t dismiss them this hard. Living next to a subpar part of Hamburg, i still profit from my Wing Tsun training 20 years ago. The basic rules still kick in when it comes to a confrontation (5 times in the last 8 years).Arioch wrote:The Japanese "martial arts," and Bushido itself, were all developed after the period in which the samurai actually fought wars. So, like most "martial arts," they have almost no military value. Some of them may have been useful for fighting duels, but even that is doubtful.
Damn telecinetic Space Elves...Arioch wrote:So Loroi observers of Terran martial arts would probably view them with mixed reactions of nostalgia and amusement.
yeah that one thought punch is murder ( especially in Fireblades case )Trantor wrote: Damn telekinetic Space Elves...