Page 183
Posted: Mon Jun 01, 2020 6:52 am
Removed for spoilers.
Good point.
Good point.
https://www.well-of-souls.com/forums/
https://www.well-of-souls.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=2497
Can I just pay 100$ and get lifetime access? I seriously don't like running obligations. And continuously paying 1$ per month is an obligation while paying 100$ once is not.Zarya wrote:Support l’artist on Patreon and read two pages ahead! (I felt seriously spoilt this morning)
I empathize with your point of view. I don't think Patreon supports that kind of situation, but I'll look into it.Arent wrote:Can I just pay 100$ and get lifetime access? I seriously don't like running obligations. And continuously paying 1$ per month is an obligation while paying 100$ once is not.Zarya wrote:Support l’artist on Patreon and read two pages ahead! (I felt seriously spoilt this morning)
Naturally, but I'd rather not have to worry about maintaining that manually. That could quickly become untenable.Werra wrote:You could set up a private mailing list and circumvent Patreon entirely.
Yep, can understand that artists want to keep organisation stuff small so that they can concentrate on art. And of course I want Arioch to concentrate on artArioch wrote:Naturally, but I'd rather not have to worry about maintaining that manually. That could quickly become untenable.Werra wrote:You could set up a private mailing list and circumvent Patreon entirely.
Artists probably want to have a reliable income they can plan with. So, Patreon might not support it because one time payments are not what artists are usually aiming for. But I suspect that there would be some people - maybe not many - who would take an expensive lifetime access over a cheap running payment.Arioch wrote:I empathize with your point of view. I don't think Patreon supports that kind of situation, but I'll look into it.
I'd be perfectly okay with that kind of "lifetime" buy-in, if it could be effectively automated. I'd just rather not have to keep track of lists of who gets what when, and establishing secure separate hosting for it. It sounds simple, but it's really not.Arent wrote:Artists probably want to have a reliable income they can plan with. So, Patreon might not support it because one time payments are not what artists are usually aiming for. But I suspect that there would be some people - maybe not many - who would take an expensive lifetime access over a cheap running payment.
I simply go for a lump sum via PayPal once a number of pages are finished or publicised. Avoids the extra country tax Patreon ads to a commitment.Arent wrote:Can I just pay 100$ and get lifetime access? I seriously don't like running obligations. And continuously paying 1$ per month is an obligation while paying 100$ once is not.Zarya wrote:Support l’artist on Patreon and read two pages ahead! (I felt seriously spoilt this morning)
But that's additional work for Arioch, right?GeoModder wrote: I simply go for a lump sum via PayPal once a number of pages are finished or publicised. Avoids the extra country tax Patreon ads to a commitment.
Why should it? Its me doing the transfer.Arent wrote:But that's additional work for Arioch, right?GeoModder wrote: I simply go for a lump sum via PayPal once a number of pages are finished or publicised. Avoids the extra country tax Patreon ads to a commitment.
Ok, so you're just donating money, but don't get any early access to patreon posts.GeoModder wrote:Why should it? Its me doing the transfer.Arent wrote:But that's additional work for Arioch, right?GeoModder wrote: I simply go for a lump sum via PayPal once a number of pages are finished or publicised. Avoids the extra country tax Patreon ads to a commitment.
Arioch only needs be pleasantly surprised there's some extra cash on his account.
Indeed.Arent wrote:Ok, so you're just donating money, but don't get any early access to patreon posts.
There was an... incident... where a plastron field ineracted with a floater drive.SaintofM wrote:Wait, what happend to 182?
GeoModder wrote:There was an... incident... where a plastron field ineracted with a floater drive.SaintofM wrote:Wait, what happend to 182?
The results... on a physics level... were cataclysmic.