Razor One wrote:Trantor wrote:Is there a contradiction?
Yes.
I say no.
Razor One wrote:Trantor wrote:What´s wrong with stereotypes?
They're a form of prejudice.
And what if they´re true nevertheless?
Razor One wrote:Trantor wrote:Razor One wrote:It further implies that women are either incapable or unwilling to take the same stance and breathe heavily as they imagine two guys having sex.
... but it's folly to think that all women aren't imagining the next "steps" and aren't getting hot and bothered while doing so.
Well, you know the difference between lesbian-sex and gay-hc?
I'm sorry, what? Could you rephrase the question? I don't understand what you're asking here.
Well, i was alluding on those differences that you deny: Men peeping at 2 Girls getting hot is one thing, but women peeping at 2 Guys doing HC is another. Should i really describe the details, e.g. how a dick looks like when it comes out of the brown saloon?
Don´t get me wrong, i don´t care for the practises of other people nor ím a gay-hater, but you can´t deny that we have a different quality here and that there aren´t many women who get hot given the picture mentioned above. The mainstream of women are not into gay-hc-porn, as mentioned earlier, they´re into romance. E.g. all my GFs were.
Razor One wrote:Trantor wrote:Razor One wrote:The reason there are no girls here is because of the general attitude displayed exemplified in your post when you brought up cattiness and bitchiness.
The funny thing is, that your position suffers from the very same pattern you´re projection on me or F110.
You reveal a deeply chauvinistic view on women if you think they´re dependend on a hero in shining armor like you.
chau·vin·ist
[shoh-vuh-nist]
noun
1.
a person who is aggressively and blindly patriotic, especially one devoted to military glory.
2.
a person who believes one gender is superior to the other, as a male chauvinist or a female chauvinist.
I wasn't aware that standing up for women's rights and equality was chauvinistic.
But you are. Your manner reveals it.
Razor One wrote:It's not like there are women here to actually defend so the whole knight in shining armour comment is at best a misapplication.
Again.
Razor One wrote:Trantor wrote:Congrats for stumbling over a two-sided sword.
Congrats for not recognising sarcasm.
Heh. Your spin doesn´t work.
Razor One wrote:Trantor wrote:Or c.) you didn´t get the joke.
Or D.) You failed to see what I did there.
Spin...
Razor One wrote:Being able to attract female readership and forum members would increase the number of people that the comic proper would be exposed to. Further, more members on the forums would increase the number of discussions and topics being generated, making this place more active and fun overall. Greater popularity would mean a larger pool of people that could potentially donate to Arioch, which in turn would mean he'd have more time to work on the comic which in turn would mean more frequent updates in the best case and would help keep the comic alive in the worst case, provided real life issues don't crop up.
Easy patterns are your thing, eh?
Razor One wrote:Commentary of the kind I pointed out tends to make female readers feel unwelcome in the same manner that most guys would feel unwelcome on the corners of the internet that house hyper-feminist sentiments.
Outsider, because of its background and quality, sadly is and never will be mainstream. It, and especially the Forum, attracts only a few people who are interested in SF, fantasy, tech and so on. IF a girl or a woman would show up here, she wouldn´t be too different from "us", and subsequently there would be no problems.
Razor One wrote:There's nothing wrong with this place being a boys club in and of itself. There are just more benefits towards this place being "Co-ed"
That has to be proven.