Hello...

Discussion regarding the Outsider webcomic, science, technology and science fiction.

Moderator: Outsider Moderators

User avatar
BlackAeronaut
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 2:18 am

Re: Hello...

Post by BlackAeronaut »

Just a Crazy-Man wrote:Why not make it 2552 were a alien refugees arrive at Harvest?
Again, time differential. As well as a space differential. I may be wrong about this, but it's quite possible that Harvest is well within either the territory of the Loroi, the Umiak, or even the contested area between the two.

Like Dr. Emmet Brown once said, you're just not thinking four-dimensionally!

Just a Crazy-Man
Posts: 89
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 2:10 pm

Re: Hello...

Post by Just a Crazy-Man »

Indeed but it makes sense as the refuges just happen to find Earth like that is a 1 in a trillion. Now UNSC has hundreds of systems and about kinda easier given their one ship limited fuel and range.

XXX

Now I had a idea they had a little nudge by a higher power a race that are called Dragons have been on the sides watching as the war went out of control I assume in my idea the reason the Cats have cloaking tech far more advance then anything the Loroi got is because it was unknowingly given to them......I also had a idea on the side that Humans create the USN or United Star Nations.

fredgiblet
Moderator
Posts: 983
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 4:02 pm

Re: Hello...

Post by fredgiblet »

Or since you're creating an AU anyway you can just shift the Soia timeline back 300 years

EDIT: Also, how about Freespace? The GTVA shows up and says "Hey guys, just so you know we brought some firepower...and some enemies that can make stars go supernova..."

Just a Crazy-Man
Posts: 89
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 2:10 pm

Re: Hello...

Post by Just a Crazy-Man »

Nice...:)

Just a Crazy-Man
Posts: 89
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 2:10 pm

Re: Hello...

Post by Just a Crazy-Man »

Plus it is Loroi date not ours.

discord
Posts: 629
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:44 am
Location: Umeå, Sweden

Re: Hello...

Post by discord »

black: yes it has the damage potential to kill ships....or planets for that matter, hitting a MOBILE target however....not so much.

the 'cats' are not canon at all.....but if you are doing crossfics the more the merrier? why not go for the whole shebang and do a marvel secret wars type thing(there can be only one) and toss in ships and crews from all over the place....how did that comic based on that idea pan out? i think it tanked hard sadly...

Absalom
Posts: 718
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 4:33 am

Re: Hello...

Post by Absalom »

It went well (from a viewer's perspective), until it stopped updating. I don't even know if it's still up.

Different tech levels can really make that sort of thing hard to do. The only 'straight forward' crossovers that I can immediately think of are Star Wars/WH40k/maybe Schlock Mercenary, and all three are kinda 'dialed to 11' universes.

As I best recall, Star Destroyers are supposed to pull somewhere in the thousands of gees of acceleration...

User avatar
Count Casimir
Moderator
Posts: 217
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 7:50 pm

Re: Hello...

Post by Count Casimir »

I remember that, it was by Kris Straub as a spinoff of Starslip. I know Starslip ended fairly recently, but I don't think he ever went back to that comic. Unfortunate, it's actually how I discovered Outsider (and a few other comics, actually).
Ashrain is best rain.

User avatar
BlackAeronaut
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 2:18 am

Re: Hello...

Post by BlackAeronaut »

discord wrote:black: yes it has the damage potential to kill ships....or planets for that matter, hitting a MOBILE target however....not so much.
Yes, but the UNSC has experience in dealing with moving targets... they tend to use highly specialized AIs to deal with moving targets, and this includes detecting and parsing minute tells (much like a highly skilled martial artist that reads your body languge to judge what your next action will be).

At any rate, UNSC captains usually don't like to fire off their MAC rounds until the projectile's travel time is down to a few seconds anyhow... and the speed at which those rounds travel will effectively halve the warning time the Umiak would have.

Also, while the Umiak are known to commence engagements from a distance, they are equally well known for their willingness to close in with their enemies. This would be a lethal mistake to make when fighting the UNSC. It would probably be a while until a survivor got back home to tell everyone what not to do when fighting the UNSC... and then they'll learn just how willing the UNSC is to use nukes. They'll even use planet-crackers if they feel the need is great enough. Wonder how the Umiak would respond when given the same ultimatum the Americans gave the Japanese.

But let's not just stop with the Umiak. I'm pretty sure that the UNSC, especially post-Covenant War UNSC, would not be too terribly pleased with the Loroi's attitude towards them. You know, the whole side-with-us-or-perish thing. That could lead to some messy misunderstandings.

Just a Crazy-Man
Posts: 89
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 2:10 pm

Re: Hello...

Post by Just a Crazy-Man »

Indeed we may end up with a war since the Loroi methods end with genocide.

discord
Posts: 629
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:44 am
Location: Umeå, Sweden

Re: Hello...

Post by discord »

black: yes yes, lots of utter bullshitium, plotholium and plain old technobabble, the math behind accuracy in space is so insanely simple it's silly.

how fast the placement of target can change(acceleration and changing direction it is accelerating in)
speed of sensors(usually light speed, but in the case of active sensors it is significantly slower, radar for instance would take twice as long, one there and one back)
accuracy of the firing platform, this could theoretically be VERY accurate but on a mobile platform performing defensive movement while taking fire it is quickly limited.

assuming light speed weapons and passive sensors and Loroi ships doing 30g omni directional semi inertia less drive, at one light second it takes one second to get the data, assuming computers and tracking is very fast and takes zero time the return trip will take one second, a Nimitz-class supercarrier is a 332.8m target on the longest axis, so lets use that as a example, since this is a VERY large ship.

okey, acceleration over two seconds at 30g is up to 600m from the sensor reading, bah, can't be arsed to do the math properly right now, but the volume it can be in is over 20 times larger then the ship in question, probably over thirty as well, but given probability of movement making things slightly more predictable lets keep it at twenty which means with PERFECT sensors and PERFECT aim you still only have something like 1 in 20 chance of scoring a hit on a HUGE target accelerating at outsider verse rates at one light second, which is the range where you can expect to start hitting the enemy....

now mass drivers of all kinds have HUGE damage potential, problem being slow unguided projectile, at which point you will undoubtedly scream that they are very fast! and on a terrestrial scale they are, on a space scale, not so much, given HUGE acceleration rates and a kilometer long barrel you would have to dump(guesstimate here) something like the total output of our sun for a second or two to get even .1c or one tenth of the speed of light out of that weapon which is three times longer then the largest currently existing warships, even given this enormous speed it would take 10 seconds to get to target add another second of sensor lag for a total of 11 during which the target can move 3300m in any direction, or ten ship lengths, at which point the chance of hitting becomes one in a few thousand or so.

next step, mass drivers will probably not get over 0.001c which is still VERY fast, the current goals for our theoretical railguns are 0.000023c, these are still in the laboratory and still not there, but it should be possible to get that much at least, realistic railguns have a effective maximum range against mobile targets of no more than 300km even given VERY slow targets and VERY fast railguns.

bottom line, ANY massdriver in a realistic verse is gonna be VERY short ranged, but if you can HIT the target you can demolish just about anything with them, problem as i have tried to point out is actually hitting the target.

Senanthes
Posts: 197
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 8:38 pm

Re: Hello...

Post by Senanthes »

Um... Just to clarify... For all those 'UNSC will kick their ass' ideas... The UNSC got obliterated in nearly every single space battle they fought against the Covenant. And even in the ones they won, they lost STAGGERING amounts of ships doing it. This includes the fleet of the legendary Preston Cole... Who often lost three quarters of his ships per engagement. In all reality, they are no more advanced than the Terrans in Outsider... In many ways, less so.

Take a look at the average UNSC frigate, which forms the backbone of their fleet... Sure, it mounts a massive coilgun (not railgun, the MAC is a coilgun by its very description), that can achieve around 30 kilometers per second with a multi-ton round... Which, honestly, isn't fast at all in terms of long range ship to ship combat. IF it hits, which it probably wont... Sure, boom, no more ship. But...

You have to turn the ENTIRE ship to do it. And UNSC ships are not quick. The few that are, such as the Pillar of Autumn, are sparkling ones offs using experimental technology. Most are limited to a few G's of acceleration for practical purposes; they dont have any way of mitigating the forces on the crew. Not to mention, most smaller Covenant ships could take multiple MAC rounds before losing their shields... Clearly, not an effective weapon against such defenses. Now...

Secondary weapons: Archer missiles and autocannons... Archers were all but ineffective against the Covenant unless they were launcherd by the hundreds, if not thousands... They were decoyed, shot down, and generally couldn't affect a shielded ship anyways... Why would they be more effective against anything in Outsider? Heck, they'd probably be even less effective, due to the combatants already having a lot of experience with torpedo swarm tactics. And autocannons?... Forget it. They're inconsequential. They barely worked on Covenant fighters and were useless against larger craft, not to mention being hillariously short ranged. They're point defense against incoming fighters, which also mount more advanced weapons... So... What does that leave an UNSC ship with? Nothing aside from a willingness to die for their country.

Now, the vaunted nukes, Shivas and NOVAS. Both can be shot down. They're missiles, and each ship carries a VERY small number of the former (3 in nearly every instance), and generally one or none of the latter. Besides which, single Shiva launches rarely destroyed Covenant vessels unless their shields were already down, and again, many were just shot down. NOVA's are as much a danger to the firing ships as to the enemy, and suffer from the same interception issue. First time they see one go off, you can bet that any further launches will become priority one for point defense... And somehow... I dont think that empires that wage war for as long as they have will bend over and kow-tow because of one big blast... So, there goes the shock and awe factor.

By contrast, Terran vessels mount FAR more compact mass drivers (likely with MANY more rounds per gun, yet another issue with the MAC system), lasers (which no known UNSC ship ever mounted as a primary weapon... Yes, I know about the ones on Prowlers that can cook a satellite. Still small potatoes to a Loroi cruiser or Umiak heavy), and missile based counter-missile defenses. They accelerate similarly, as well. Armor I can't compare since I dont know what a Terran vessel will actually withstand here, but I think we can assume that combat would be rather deadly for both sides.

As for post-war UNSC ships? The only one I've ever heard of is the Infinity... Which was brought down. We have no solid information on them yet, so thats an unknon factor. To be fair, I coudl see such vessels being more or less equal to what the Loroi or Umiak field, but they would be few in number.

And... To cover the last, possibly best weapon the UNSC would have... Spartans. What good is your power armored ubermensch when a Teidar will likely sense them coming and kill them with a thought? They were never put up against opposition that could literally bypass their advantages entirely, always in a marathon of endurance and straight up firepower in every instance.

In summary... I dont see how it would go any better for the UNSC against either of the two alien aggressors than it would against the Covenant, particularly since neither is limiting themselves for theological reasons, nor are they stratified in their technology. That concludes my latest rant, thank you for your time.

Just a Crazy-Man
Posts: 89
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 2:10 pm

Re: Hello...

Post by Just a Crazy-Man »

Don't forget AI's.

Absalom
Posts: 718
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 4:33 am

Re: Hello...

Post by Absalom »

Senanthes wrote:And... To cover the last, possibly best weapon the UNSC would have... Spartans. What good is your power armored ubermensch when a Teidar will likely sense them coming and kill them with a thought? They were never put up against opposition that could literally bypass their advantages entirely, always in a marathon of endurance and straight up firepower in every instance.
Actually, the Teidar wouldn't sense them coming if we assume biological equivalence between Outsider Humans and Halo Humans, but they probably wouldn't be able to get onto Loroi or Umiak planets anyways, so no big difference. Besides, the seemingly 'best batch' (the second) was almost completely wiped out, the first is apparently mostly or entirely dead, and the third batch is apparently hot-headed, so not a primary combat force regardless.
Senanthes wrote:In summary... I dont see how it would go any better for the UNSC against either of the two alien aggressors than it would against the Covenant, particularly since neither is limiting themselves for theological reasons, nor are they stratified in their technology. That concludes my latest rant, thank you for your time.
The one thing you forgot to account for, as mentioned by Crazy Man, is A.I.s. Only the Historians seem to have a similar capability, and they presumably won't just lend them out.

Though the Covenant were likely lousy on IT security, so that just means the Halo Humans would have the best (or second best) pilots in the local bubble, which is pretty unimportant if you don't have the ships to make use of them. If the Halo Humans could get some salvage and enough time to reverse-engineer and use enough of it then they'd become the most potent navy short of the Historians, but beyond that they'd be out of luck.

Just a Crazy-Man
Posts: 89
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 2:10 pm

Re: Hello...

Post by Just a Crazy-Man »

Battles are won by good commanders which the UNSC has the best training of.

Senanthes
Posts: 197
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 8:38 pm

Re: Hello...

Post by Senanthes »

First, Absalom, thank you for correcting me. Seriously. ^.^

Second, in response to the UNSC having the best commanders. You appear to be completely disregarding that all of the factions herein have the capacity to, and likely do (I think we've already seen one example in Stillstorm), have their own great tactical and strategic minds. Moreover, the UNSC didn't win because of its commanders. Or its Spartans. Honestly, it didn't even win. It survived. And it did so because the Covenant turned on itself when it was revealed that their entire religion was a lie. Sure, several quick thinkers bought time and pulled off some miraculous stunts, but consider what the outcome would have been if the Covenant hadn't fractured.

A.I.s are something of a grey area (thanks for bringing that up, by the way. ^.^). So far, we've only seen the historian A.I.s, but who can say what experience everyone else has with them, or means to keep them from running willy-nilly through their own networks? And, unfortunately, most of the UNSC ships did, indeed have onboard A.I.s during the war (rarely referenced by name, but still referenced), which tells much of the overall difference they made in ship to ship combat. While I'm sure they did make some difference, they didn't cut down on the horrid slaughter of the UNSC's fleets. Further, since we're referencing Cortana here as the prime example (with the mention of IT security), with all her diefic abilities to invade and all but control other systems, it should be noted that she was a one of a kind wunderkind among AI's, and not a typical example. Most were nowhere near as capable.

Again, as Absalom said, without some miracles thrown their way, they'd be largely out of luck. And I dont see alien races that consider genocide as a solution allowing them to have the time they'd need to make use of anything they found, short of someone just handing them new toys fresh off the shelf, so to speak. Mostly, my point is, the disparity of the suggested factions so far (Starfleet, the UNSC) really makes for a predictable outcome short of author intervention and a lot of unlikely coincidence. In the end, you can do what you will, and I laud you for it :) Just seems like a one sided fistfight is all, one way or the other.

discord
Posts: 629
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 7:44 am
Location: Umeå, Sweden

Re: Hello...

Post by discord »

crazy: no, neither wars nor battles are won by 'good commanders' they are won by a combination of men, training and tools...despite common belief 'commanders' and the decisions they make seldom make for great victories, it's the other guys fucking up that create fantastic failures.

Senanthes
Posts: 197
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 8:38 pm

Re: Hello...

Post by Senanthes »

discord wrote:crazy: no, neither wars nor battles are won by 'good commanders' they are won by a combination of men, training and tools...despite common belief 'commanders' and the decisions they make seldom make for great victories, it's the other guys fucking up that create fantastic failures.
I could not have said it better myself. Thank you, sir. ^.^

User avatar
Arioch
Site Admin
Posts: 4486
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:19 am
Location: San Jose, CA
Contact:

Re: Hello...

Post by Arioch »

It is fair to say though that superior men and training are often directly due to the "good commanders."

User avatar
junk
Posts: 210
Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2011 11:52 am

Re: Hello...

Post by junk »

BlackAeronaut wrote:
discord wrote:black: yes it has the damage potential to kill ships....or planets for that matter, hitting a MOBILE target however....not so much.
Yes, but the UNSC has experience in dealing with moving targets... they tend to use highly specialized AIs to deal with moving targets, and this includes detecting and parsing minute tells (much like a highly skilled martial artist that reads your body languge to judge what your next action will be).

At any rate, UNSC captains usually don't like to fire off their MAC rounds until the projectile's travel time is down to a few seconds anyhow... and the speed at which those rounds travel will effectively halve the warning time the Umiak would have.

Also, while the Umiak are known to commence engagements from a distance, they are equally well known for their willingness to close in with their enemies. This would be a lethal mistake to make when fighting the UNSC. It would probably be a while until a survivor got back home to tell everyone what not to do when fighting the UNSC... and then they'll learn just how willing the UNSC is to use nukes. They'll even use planet-crackers if they feel the need is great enough. Wonder how the Umiak would respond when given the same ultimatum the Americans gave the Japanese.

But let's not just stop with the Umiak. I'm pretty sure that the UNSC, especially post-Covenant War UNSC, would not be too terribly pleased with the Loroi's attitude towards them. You know, the whole side-with-us-or-perish thing. That could lead to some messy misunderstandings.
Halo is completely broken from a calc standpoint. I remember that one cannon fluff bible that was released which put infantry weapons at ranges below guns used in WW1 and the same was done for vehicle weapons and possible ship weapons.

If those hard numbers were followed, today's north korea could potentially take care of any UNSC contingent no matter how big.

It would be like having a modern army go against one from the 30year war.

Post Reply