Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Discussion regarding the Outsider webcomic, science, technology and science fiction.

Moderator: Outsider Moderators

User avatar
Arioch
Site Admin
Posts: 4486
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:19 am
Location: San Jose, CA
Contact:

Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Post by Arioch »

As some of you may know, the first nuclear aircraft carrier CVN-65 USS Enterprise, in service since 1961 is due to be retired in 2013 and replaced by CVN-78 USS Gerald R. Ford, the first of a new class of aircraft carrier.

During the ceremony on Friday in which Enterprise was inactivated, the Navy announced that the ship's name would be transferred to a new vessel, the third Ford-class carrier to be built (CVN-80), which is planned to be in service some time around 2025.

http://www.defense.gov/releases/release ... seid=15708

(For any who were wondering, CVN-79 is planned to be named John F. Kennedy.)

Image
"Task Force 1" in 1964: Enterprise with nuclear-powered escorts Long Beach and Bainbridge

NOMAD
Posts: 457
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 5:34 am

Re: Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Post by NOMAD »

YAHOOOOO, the ENT name still lives on.

i hope the old CVN is turned into a museum, long chances of that happening, but the Enterprise name is famous in history and sci-fi circles.

Glad is see the US navy will still have a various of the "Grey Ghost'
I am a wander, going from place to place without a home I am a NOMAD

fredgiblet
Moderator
Posts: 983
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 4:02 pm

Re: Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Post by fredgiblet »

Good news indeed.

User avatar
Smithy
Posts: 60
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 6:10 pm
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Post by Smithy »

I still can't believe they scrapped USS Enterprise (CV-6) in the late 1950's. That hunk of steel was the epitome of a fighting ship at war.

So in a way every Big-E after the Yorktown class just seems a little sad to me..

User avatar
GeoModder
Posts: 1038
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:31 pm

Re: Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Post by GeoModder »

Well, even capital ships grow old...
Image

User avatar
Arioch
Site Admin
Posts: 4486
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:19 am
Location: San Jose, CA
Contact:

Re: Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Post by Arioch »

One the one hand, it's too bad that the plans to make CV-6 into a museum fell through; if any ship deserved such honors it was certainly the Big E. But on the other hand, I think having the ship preserved might have prevented the name being used again, and that would be too bad... CVN-65 was, I think, a worthy successor, being the first nuclear carrier, the only member of her class, to this date the longest naval vessel ever built, and the longest-serving vessel in the history of the US Navy (with the exception of USS Constitution, which is only formally still in commission).

(And if the name had never been reused, there's a certain well-known starship that might have ended up with a different name...)

My impression is that CVN-65 is already scheduled to be scrapped.

Wintermute
Posts: 77
Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:09 am

Re: Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Post by Wintermute »

Before anyone gets up in-arms about the CVN-65 most-likely-not going to be turned into a museum (I'm sad too), remember that to decommission the ship they need to remove a whole-lotta stuff from the inside, including the nuclear powerplant (and associated facilities). From what I've read, by the time they finished with that, there wouldn't be a whole lot of "ship" left to be turned into a museum.

User avatar
GeoModder
Posts: 1038
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:31 pm

Re: Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Post by GeoModder »

Ah, the ease of using fossile fuel-propelled capital ships! You can turn them into museums without the hassle of removing power plants. :lol:

Just checked how many capital ships were turned into musea in the US. Thirteen battleships and carriers already? Wow...
Image

fredgiblet
Moderator
Posts: 983
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 4:02 pm

Re: Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Post by fredgiblet »

I'm pretty sure that percentage-wise that's not very high.

User avatar
GeoModder
Posts: 1038
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:31 pm

Re: Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Post by GeoModder »

About 64 battleships, and 77 aircraft carriers, have been existence or are still in service in the US Navy. That's about 10% turned into museums after service life.
There's not many nations retaining this percentage of former military vessels as musea...
Image

User avatar
Trantor
Posts: 780
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:52 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Re: Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Post by Trantor »

GeoModder wrote:About 64 battleships, and 77 aircraft carriers, have been existence or are still in service in the US Navy. That's about 10% turned into museums after service life.
There's not many nations retaining this percentage of former military vessels as musea...
Do diving destinations count? Then the germans have 100%.

scnr.
sapere aude.

Absalom
Posts: 718
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2011 4:33 am

Re: Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Post by Absalom »

Trantor wrote:
GeoModder wrote:About 64 battleships, and 77 aircraft carriers, have been existence or are still in service in the US Navy. That's about 10% turned into museums after service life.
There's not many nations retaining this percentage of former military vessels as musea...
Do diving destinations count? Then the germans have 100%.

scnr.
No, that would be a tourist trap.

User avatar
GeoModder
Posts: 1038
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:31 pm

Re: Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Post by GeoModder »

Trantor wrote:Do diving destinations count? Then the germans have 100%.
Well... no! :twisted:
(this would up the percentage of museums all over the world :P )
Image

JQBogus
Posts: 157
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 5:42 pm

Re: Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Post by JQBogus »

Trantor wrote: Do diving destinations count? Then the germans have 100%.

scnr.
/Pedant ON

Actually, not that many German capital ships (Battleships, Battlecruisers, Carriers) are available as diving destinations.

WWI era : 26 Battleships and Battlecriusers built (plus one seized from the Russians, for 27 total)
1 Scrapped by Germany
20 Scrapped by other than Germany (Many after being awarded as reparations, more scuttled at Scapa Flow, but raised & scrapped before WWII)
2* Sunk as targets (one was reparation ship, other was recovered from Scapa Flow).
3* Scuttled at Scapa Flow, never raised.
1* Scuttled after severe damage at Jutland.

WWII era : 7 Battleships (3 Deutschland class "Pocket Battleships", 2 Scharnhorsts, 2 Bismarcks)
4 Heavily damaged or sunk in port/canals/shallows, were scrapped rather than repaired.
1* Blown up by its own crew off S. America
2* Sunk in Battle

So the ones marked with a (*) are theoretically available to divers. 9 out of 34, or about 26.5%. No German dreadnought era capital ships remain afloat in any capacity.

Also note that there is some debate about the Deutschlands actually being capital ships.

/Pedant OFF

User avatar
Arioch
Site Admin
Posts: 4486
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 4:19 am
Location: San Jose, CA
Contact:

Re: Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Post by Arioch »

And most of those are far too deep to be visited by divers... but I don't think that was the point of the joke.

User avatar
Trantor
Posts: 780
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:52 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Re: Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Post by Trantor »

Actually, since this topic is about aircraft carriers, the Graf Zeppelin is available to divers.

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graf_Zeppelin_(1938)

100%. ;)
sapere aude.

JQBogus
Posts: 157
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 5:42 pm

Re: Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Post by JQBogus »

I didn't include it because it was never commissioned, but I probably should have included it since it was launched.

User avatar
GeoModder
Posts: 1038
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:31 pm

Re: Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Post by GeoModder »

Trantor wrote:Actually, since this topic is about aircraft carriers, the Graf Zeppelin is available to divers.

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graf_Zeppelin_(1938)

100%. ;)
How about a link to the English article? :P
Image

Suederwind
Posts: 772
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:55 pm

Re: Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Post by Suederwind »

How about a link to the English article?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_air ... f_Zeppelin

Btw: its more than 87 m under water and so diving there is not easy.
Forum RP: Cydonia Rising
[RP]Cydonia Rising [IC]

Dragoon
Posts: 131
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 8:28 pm
Location: US North Carolina: Eastern standard Time Zone
Contact:

Re: Navy’s Third Ford-Class Aircraft Carrier to be Named...

Post by Dragoon »

Well that's sad, my father helped build that ship and has always been very proud of that fact. Gonna hate to have to tell him their putting her down.

Still Fifty some years of very active service. A couple of wars, more than a few missions, and surviving a fire that could have well sent her to the bottom in the sixties...Not bad. She can rest easy.

Post Reply