The Aircraft Image Posting Contest

Discussion regarding the Outsider webcomic, science, technology and science fiction.

Moderator: Outsider Moderators

Post Reply
TrashMan
Posts: 306
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:01 pm

Re: Page 99

Post by TrashMan »

Tomact is way cooler..and looks way better. :P

User avatar
Trantor
Posts: 780
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:52 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Re: Page 99

Post by Trantor »

TrashMan wrote:Tomact is way cooler...
Air Ahmadinedshad. :P
TrashMan wrote:..and looks way better. :P
You sure?

Image
sapere aude.

Nemo
Posts: 277
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 1:04 am

Re: Page 99

Post by Nemo »

You want a fast sweep wing F/A with lotsa payload including nukes and good capabilities in dogfight and in fast ultra-low-level-flight in difficult terrain?
Buy Panavia Tornado! It has RR/MTU-engines AND Messerschmidt-Genes - you can´t have it any better!
Its a good plane, but buying Tornados wont grease any politician's home districts. Sides, those wings swing the wrong way :roll:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=iRQXAA ... &q&f=false

Michael
Posts: 243
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 6:51 pm
Location: England

Re: Page 99

Post by Michael »

fools, i give you the best air plane ever built


Image

The WWII Spitfire, British, of course

[EDIT] pic changed
Last edited by Michael on Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:44 pm, edited 2 times in total.
CJ Miller: How many millions must be banned before we stop having pointless arguments on the Internet?
fredgiblet: ALL OF THEM! Our banhammers will blot out the sun!
CptWinters: Then we will troll in the shade.!
Image
Image
Image

Fotiadis_110
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 11:15 pm

Re: Page 99

Post by Fotiadis_110 »

Michael wrote:fools, i give you the best air plane ever built

The WWII Spitfire, British, of course
I'm sorry but you posted the wrong picture.
Spitfire handling was found to improve on the 'clipped wing' variants.
:p

Michael
Posts: 243
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 6:51 pm
Location: England

Re: Page 99

Post by Michael »

damn, I though that looked wrong, but couldn't place it

[EDIT] better?
CJ Miller: How many millions must be banned before we stop having pointless arguments on the Internet?
fredgiblet: ALL OF THEM! Our banhammers will blot out the sun!
CptWinters: Then we will troll in the shade.!
Image
Image
Image

Fotiadis_110
Posts: 141
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 11:15 pm

Re: Page 99

Post by Fotiadis_110 »

I think their handling would improve again if we added winglets, but that is largely academic.

I did find it amusing to learn that fact that the classic oval wing had lower manoeuvrability than when they simply removed the wing-tips however ^_^.

TrashMan
Posts: 306
Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 2:01 pm

Re: Page 99

Post by TrashMan »

Trantor wrote:
TrashMan wrote:Tomact is way cooler...
Air Ahmadinedshad. :P
It just proves he's a smart man.


TrashMan wrote:..and looks way better. :P
You sure?

Image[/quote]

http://www.fantom-xp.org/-/F-14_-_Tomcat.htm

I'm sure

dfacto
Posts: 118
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2011 10:50 am

Re: Page 99

Post by dfacto »

Michael wrote:fools, i give you the best air plane ever built

The WWII Spitfire, British, of course

[EDIT] pic changed
Oh my, looks like you misspelled p-51 Mustang in google image search. How embarrassing, let me fix that for you.
Image

;)

Michael
Posts: 243
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2011 6:51 pm
Location: England

Re: Page 99

Post by Michael »

dfacto wrote:
Michael wrote:fools, i give you the best air plane ever built

The WWII Spitfire, British, of course

[EDIT] pic changed
Oh my, looks like you misspelled p-51 Mustang in google image search. How embarrassing, let me fix that for you.

;)
silly American, can't spell spitfire, here let me help you, S.P.I.T.F.I.R.E.

you'r all so helpless can't even spell A.L.U.M.I.N.I.U.M
where would you be with me? ;)
CJ Miller: How many millions must be banned before we stop having pointless arguments on the Internet?
fredgiblet: ALL OF THEM! Our banhammers will blot out the sun!
CptWinters: Then we will troll in the shade.!
Image
Image
Image

User avatar
GeoModder
Posts: 1043
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:31 pm

Re: Page 99

Post by GeoModder »

Keep your "classics" in mind, people... :roll:

Image
Image

User avatar
ed_montague
Posts: 199
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:33 pm

Re: Page 99

Post by ed_montague »

No love for the Warhawk? None?

Image
Ensign Jardin is my name
And Terra is my nation
Deep space is my dwelling-place
The stars my destination

Nemo
Posts: 277
Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2011 1:04 am

Re: Page 99

Post by Nemo »

Can you have a Thunderbolt II without a I?

Image

User avatar
Trantor
Posts: 780
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:52 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Re: Page 99

Post by Trantor »

Propellers?
Oh, you Guys are sooo stone-age.

Image
sapere aude.

User avatar
bunnyboy
Posts: 547
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:21 pm
Location: Finland

Re: Page 99

Post by bunnyboy »

Trantor wrote:Propellers?
Oh, you Guys are sooo stone-age.
Once men were iron on wooden ships planes. Hii-ohoi!
Now iron ships planes have wooden men. Hii-ohoi. Hii-ohoi!
Translated from old song.
Supporter of forum RPG

CptWinters
Posts: 177
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:20 pm

Re: Page 99

Post by CptWinters »

bunnyboy wrote:
Trantor wrote:Propellers?
Oh, you Guys are sooo stone-age.
Once men were iron on wooden ships planes. Hii-ohoi!
Now iron ships planes have wooden men. Hii-ohoi. Hii-ohoi!
Translated from old song.
There has been lots of speculation about when the "Old Corps" ended and
the "New Corps" began.

I researched this and found the answer.

In 1775 the United States Marine Corps was formed at Tun Tavern in Philadelphia.

In the beginning they announced that any new recruit would get a free
tankard of rum.

But they didn't get as many recruits as they wanted so they announced
that from then on all new recruits would get two tankards of rum,

A Marine in the back ranks said,
"We didn't have it that good in the Old Corps"

User avatar
GeoModder
Posts: 1043
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:31 pm

Re: Page 99

Post by GeoModder »

Trantor wrote:Propellers?
Oh, you Guys are sooo stone-age.

Image
Good one! :lol:
Is there a typical German term for barely-worth-the-name cutting-edge technology, like ersatz or something? ;)
Image

User avatar
elorran
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2011 9:31 pm

Re: Page 99

Post by elorran »

I always had a personal like for the Mosquito. Laughed at when it was first presented, it went on to become one of the most versatile planes of the war.

Image

User avatar
Trantor
Posts: 780
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2011 1:52 pm
Location: Hamburg, Germany

Re: Page 99

Post by Trantor »

bunnyboy wrote:Once men were iron on wooden ships planes. Hii-ohoi!
Now iron ships planes have wooden men. Hii-ohoi. Hii-ohoi!
Translated from old song.
"Cars of cardboard need men of steel" - that one is popular in eastern germany among "Trabant"-drivers.
:mrgreen:

GeoModder wrote:Is there a typical German term for barely-worth-the-name cutting-edge technology, like ersatz or something? ;)
Um, sorry, can you please rephrase your question for me? It´s not your fault, it´s my english not being good enough to understand what you´re up to?

elorran wrote:I always had a personal like for the Mosquito. Laughed at when it was first presented, it went on to become one of the most versatile planes of the war.
My first military model aircraft. :)
sapere aude.

User avatar
GeoModder
Posts: 1043
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 6:31 pm

Re: Page 99

Post by GeoModder »

Trantor wrote:
GeoModder wrote:Is there a typical German term for barely-worth-the-name cutting-edge technology, like ersatz or something? ;)
Um, sorry, can you please rephrase your question for me? It´s not your fault, it´s my english not being good enough to understand what you´re up to?
The Messerschmidt 262 definitely was a game-breaker in air warfare because of its speed and some other flying aspects. And the first in reliable operation.
But only a few years later jets from other nations surpassed it.
So what I mean to ask is, is there a German term for a cutting-edge system/object, that only shines for a short term before it is surpassed by others?
Image

Post Reply